- October 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Mr. El-Erian of PIMCO, says in this article that US will require a ‘Sputnik Moment’ again to regain its lost glory.
He also says that there is no one to step in US shoes. And, though world has to live with the downgrade, at core US will still be Triple-A.
Can US do it again?
“Sputnik Moment” — is a visible shock to the national psyche that can unify Americans around a common vision and a renewed sense of purpose — that of halting gradual secular decline by putting the country back on the path of high growth, job creation and financial soundness.
It started with the Space Age and later ended in the Cold War between the US & The USSR.
However, I second his views on the ‘Sputnik Moment’.
Year was 1957
There are two points to be considered here:
- In 1957, US GDP was roughly at $460B against external debt of $270B which amounts to Debt to GDP ratio of 58%.
- US had Gold Standard then which was in effect till 1971 when President Nixon approved to delink dollar from Gold.
Now considering point 1, US had an enormous fiscal clout then to start a space age to compete with the USSR as Debt to GDP ratio was roughly half of total GDP. And due to this the fiscal position never went out of hand until 1971 when Gold Standard against which the US dollar was pegged was abolished and the US government had a free hand to print greenbacks at will.
2011 is not 1957
It would be difficult to have a ‘Sputnik Moment’ now. Nothing comes for free and to have that New Era, US does not have enough fiscal elasticity to move forward. The only option it seems now is to just print more money which of course will do but in return will see debt piling up further (read: debt trap).
One thing US has in its favor is that US has taken debt in its own currency so in future if and when fiscal position improves, US wont have to repay by selling its currency. Moreover, US also does not have to worry much about depreciation of its currency as major holders of US Treasury bonds (China & Japan) wont allow that to happen as it would hurt them most as it will lead to a depreciation of their bonds.
No one likes ‘hero’ of a movie to be in trouble and same goes for US also. A prosperous US means prosperous World. But one thing is certain – There would be gradual decline of US’s economic clout. Of course, there is nothing to worry about its position for next few decades but its position would be something akin to Microsoft of 2011. With companies like Google, Facebook & Apple in the picture, Microsoft’s position has greatly been compromised.
Same could be true for US also…
Large but not important…
– Saumil Mehta
In 1985, when Big Bull Rakesh Jhunjhunwala entered the market with Rs 5,000 as his initial capital, his dream was to earn about Rs 1 lakh a month. Now after journeying through a little over a quarter a century, even the man himself doesn’t remember when he had crossed that dream to enter into the current realty of probably earning much more than a lakh of rupees every hour.
He was dubbed by media as India’s greatest investor, the Oracle of Mumbai; Rakesh Jhunjhunwala is an Indian Chartered Accountant by qualification but an investor/trader by profession. In 2010, Forbes rated him India’s 51st and the world’s #1062 richest man with wealth of $1.0 billion. Much like Warren Buffet, he buys into the business model of a company by judging the longevity and growth potential. He gives top priority to “competitive ability” and “management quality” of the enterprise. But Rakesh’s investment mantra took some interesting turns for growth, with a subtle endorsement for “momentum,” a dirty word for many die-hard value investors. Here is a summary of Rakesh Jhunjhunwala’s version of intelligent investing based on his talks over the years. FOCUS ON THE “COMPETITIVE ABILITY” OF THE BUSINESS
Sixth-century BC poet Lao Tzu remarked that “those who have knowledge don’t predict” while “those who predict don’t have knowledge”. So if forecasts are so useless, why do we spend so much time making them and reading about them?
Some fun facts about Apple’s turnaround:
- +8,524% (37.7% annualized): Stock performance since Steve Jobs’ return to Apple in 1997.
- +821% (18.6% annualized): Revenue growth since Jobs’ return.
- +5,093% (66.4% annualized): Stock performance since the launch of the iTunes Store in April, 2003. (A disruptive innovation.)
- +951% (39.9% annualized): Revenue growth since iTunes Store launch.
- In the last 8 years, revenue has grown by $60 billion (1,000%). 73% of that growth came from newly launched products.
- In the last 3 years, revenue has grown by $40 billion (165%). 60% of that growth came from iPhone sales.
- $220 billion: Amount of products sold since the release of the first iPod.
- $19 billion: Apple’s cut of all sales through the iTunes Store, plus Apple iPod accessories (currently $5 billion a year).
- 298 million: Total number of iPod units sold.
- 90 million: Total number of iPhone units sold.
- If the cash and securities on Apple’s balance sheet (~$60 billion) was turned into a hedge fund, it would be the biggest in the world.
Most prognosticators miss the mark—but there are ways you can profit from their predictions.
By JASON ZWEIG
Every January, hordes of highly paid experts attempt to predict what the economy and the markets will do in the coming year. Later in the year, nearly all of the forecasts turn out to be wrong.
Here, we hope to offer something different: a blueprint for how to make practical use of these predictions, even when you suspect they are wrong. Taken together, forecasts can point toward the best and worst outcomes you can reasonably expect in a given year—and tell you how confident you should (or shouldn’t) be.
Forecasting is as old as markets themselves. Records from ancient Mesopotamia, according to research by historian Alice Louise Slotsky, are full of references to omens that were believed to predict commodity prices, such as “the raven is for a steady market.”
Practically ever since, pundits have been pumping out forecasts—and missing the mark. Think back over the past year, when technical indicators called the “Hindenburg omen” and the “death cross” were said to predict that stocks would collapse, China’s stock market was expected to keep booming and a “double dip” recession in the U.S. looked likely to many market experts. So far, at least, none of those things has happened.
If the forecasters are right for this year, then U.S. stocks will go up roughly 10%, 10-year Treasury yields will run around 3%, inflation will be a bit under 2%, and the economy will expand 3% or so. Yet it would be naïve to think you could bet accordingly.
Why do people with years of experience, massive expertise and mountains of data at their disposal so often get the future wrong?
First and foremost, the future is the realm of surprises; no one, no matter how expert, can reliably foresee what will happen and how people will react to it. As the economist Friedrich von Hayek said in his lecture “The Pretence of Knowledge” when he won the 1974 Nobel prize in economics, “in the study of such complex phenomena as the market, which depend on the actions of many individuals, all the circumstances which will determine the outcome of a process … will hardly ever be fully known or measurable.”
It is guaranteed,” said the relationship manager (RM), stretching the ‘ees’ for emphasis. He needn’t have. I got the idea, or at least, pretended to. The guaranteed- NAV Ulip (unitlinked insurance plan) would ensure that I earn the highest returns the market delivered during the tenure of the policy. A false smile in place, I sat back on the plush couch of the private sector bank.
Ostensibly, I was digesting the implication, guaranteed returns from an equities instrument for 10 years. The absurdity of the promise was clear. How are investors misled so easily? Don’t they crunch numbers or ask how the insurance company will assure high returns consistently? Oblivious to my thoughts, the RM had ordered two cups of coffee and the application form of the Ulip. May be it was my imagination, but his smile seemed smug.